A collection of exercises and their solutions [pdf, in Finnish] is available. An [English version] will be made available as the course proceeds. The problems are approximately graded for difficulty as follows:
* -- An easy problem; can be solved directly from the definitions or
directly applying the algorithms discussed.
** -- Moderately difficult; requires some insight or is slightly more laborious
*** -- Somewhat challenging; requires applying the knowledge gained in the course or is somewhat laborious
In exercise sessions assistant shows solutions to 3-4 demo exercises from the topic of the lecture one week before.
Home assignments and peer reviewing them are an obligatory part of the course. The three home assignments will be published on this page.
The home assignments (and peer reviewing them) must be passed before
taking the exam. The weight of the home assignments on the course is
considerable: the maximum score on the exam is 24, and each home
assignment is graded on a 0-6 scale. We guarantee that with 50% of all
points a student will pass the course. Other than this the grading
scale is decided afterwards.
If a submission is clearly deficient, the student will be asked to
revise it. Also a good report can be returned to the student for
revision, if the report contains a significant error.
Approximate guidelines: less than 3 points = unacceptable; significant shortcomings in the solution or badly reported; will be returned to the student to be completed. 3 points = least acceptable performance. Minimum requirements satisfied and adequately reported. 6 points = a truly extraordinary performance. Presents something special regarding the problem considered and is very well reported. If a report is returned to the student for revision, 1 point is subtracted from the score. Each time a student submits a report, a revised report, or a peer review after the deadline similarly costs one point, and one extra point for every three days late.
Familiarize yourself with the instructions for submitting
the home assignments. There are also LaTeX templates for the is
also a report [pdf] and code [pdf]
parts of the submission.
The students will review the submissions of two other students using
the given form.
The form is emailed to the assistant, who will then forward the
evaluations to the authors of the report. In this way everyone receives
two peer reviews for each report.