1. Rating Rate the paper in the following categories (For each category, choose a one numeric rating) Overall grade (overall, how do you rate this summary paper?) 4: Very good Language (how fluent is the language, did you understand what this paper is saying?) 4: Very good Technical quality 4: Contents are mostly correct. Some improvements suggested below. Editorial quality 4: Mostly understandable, some improvements identified below Confidence (how confident are you about this review?) 2: I have some general knowledge of this subject 2. Detailed comments Provide detailed written comments on the paper. In general, your main aim as a reviewer is to help improve the paper. Be as specific as you can when you point out errors or problems. Suggest concrete improvements whenever possible. Your review should cover the following three aspects. Use the suggested guidelines in composing your review for each aspect. The paper is clear to introduce the basic concepts and technologies on PLA. However, some code samples and headers structure are preferred to provide to demostrate the details of PLA