1. Rating
   Rate the paper in the following categories (For each category, choose a one numeric rating)
 
  Overall grade (overall, how do you rate this summary paper?)
    4: Very good

  Language (how fluent is the language, did you understand what this 
  paper is saying?)
    4: Very good

  Technical quality
    5: Contents are completely correct. There are no errors. It corresponds
       information on the source material.

  Editorial quality
    4: Mostly understandable, some improvements identified below. 

  Confidence (how confident are you about this review?)
    2: I have some general knowledge of this subject


2. Detailed comments 
	The strength of the particular paper was the analysis and more 
specifically the comparison of all the on-demand protocols in same 
terms. That makes it easier for the reader to understand the 
functionality of every protocol and their main differences. 
	
The text was written very well and was easily readable. However, there were few missing details and grammar/spelling mistakes. 

Editorial comments:
    - Page numbers missing 

    - Some sentences are quite long or grammatically wrong, confusing the reader:
	- page 1, paragraph 2: However, because the routing overhead 
required by these protocols to establish a route in response to a 
request from a source node or to reconfigure a route after a link 
break, different optimization techniques are required by different 
protocols to reduce such overhead.
	- page 1, paragraph 5: this packets is flooded
	- page 2, paragraph 3: The key feature of this protocol is that applying a distributed routing scheme
	- page 3, paragraph 2: This way all the nodes on the path including the source know about it..
	- page 4, paragraph 3: Then, it forwards the packet directly to all of these links whatever the link is stable or not

    - There were no tables or figures that could help reader to understand the content of the paper

    - Nine spelling errors:
	- page 1, paragraph 1: It should be have this very instead of have it very
	- page 1, paragraph 4: is that it is a pure on-demand protocol instead of is that is a pure on-demand protocol
	- page 1, paragraph 4: on the other hand instead of on the hand
	- page 2, paragraph 5: if it does not have instead of if it does no has
	- page 2, paragraph 6: as if it does not have a path instead of as it does not has a path
	- page 4, paragraph 1: association instead of associatively  
	- page 4, paragraph 3: except instead of expect 
	- page 5, paragraph 1: find instead of fine
	- page 6, paragraph 2: summary instead of summery