1. Rating
   Rate the paper in the following categories (For each category, 
choose a one numeric rating)
 
  Overall grade (overall, how do you rate this summary paper?)
    4: Very good

  Language (how fluent is the language, did you understand what this 
  paper is saying?)
    4: Very good

  Technical quality
    5: Contents are completely correct. There are no errors. It corresponds
       information on the source material.

  Editorial quality
    4: Mostly understandable, some improvements identified below. 

  Confidence (how confident are you about this review?)
    2: I have some general knowledge of this subject


2. Detailed comments
	The main advantage of the paper was its very good structure. The 
protocols were divided into three main classes based on routing information, 
use of temporal information and routing topology. After that, each class was 
divided into several categories of protocols. Main focus was given to the 
first class of the protocols and particularly to the Table-driven routing 
protocols. 
	
The text was generally ok. However, there were quite few missing 
details and grammar/spelling mistakes. 

Editorial comments:
    - Page numbers missing 

    - Few references are after the headings. They should be somewhere inside the text
	- page 4: reference [1,9] should be inside the text
	- page 5: reference [1,10] should be inside the text
	- page 6: reference [1,11] should be inside the text
	- page 7: reference [1,12] should be inside the text

    - Some sentences are quite long or grammatically wrong, confusing the reader:
	- page 1, paragraph 2: First of all, such protocols must be 
distributed, because depending on a central host to make the routing 
decisions introduces a bottle neck or even to a single point of failure 
considering the limited resources of the mobile nodes.
	- page 2, paragraph 2: Inside a single zone, routing is done 
based using table-driven mechanisms while an on-demand routing is 
applied for routing beyond the zone boundaries.
	- page 4, paragraph 5: (it can number of hops)
	- page 7, first line: similar to those in DSDV applied

    - There were no tables or figures that could help reader to understand the content of the paper

    - Nine spelling errors/one typo:
	- page 2, paragraph 1: It should be Ad Hoc instead of Ah Hoc
	- page 2, paragraph 5: signaling instead of signalling
	- page 2, paragraph 6: reduces the signaling instead of reduced signalling
	- page 3, paragraph 4: and then it makes approximate routing decisions regarding the expected future state.
	- Page 4, paragraph 2: Flat instead of Fat
	- Page 4, paragraph 2: information is exchanged instead of information are exchanged + 
information is not instead of information are not
	- Page 4, paragraph 4: this information is supposed instead of these information are supposed 
	- page 7, paragraph 2: is instead of ii
	- page 7, paragraph 4: summary instead of summery
	- page 8, typo in reference [11]