36474R           0/15 fail	1:()  2:()  3:()  4:()  5:()
43473B           0/15 fail	1:()  2:()  3:()  4:()  5:()
44656H           9/15 fail	1:(3)  2:(3) "decryption with public key" = signature verification  3:(0)  4:(3)  5:(0)
45181W           0/15 fail	1:()  2:()  3:()  4:()  5:()
45283H           0/15 fail	1:()  2:()  3:()  4:()  5:()
46576J           0/15 fail	1:()  2:()  3:()  4:()  5:()
46602S          13/15 pass	1:(3)  although in b -- this is not the group generated by P, which is a subgroup of the whole curve  2:(3)  3:(3)  4:(3)  5:(1)
46770N          11/15 pass	1:(3)  2:(2)  alice encrypts -- should sign   3:(2)  4:(3)  5:(1)
47991U           9/15 fail	1:(3)  2:(1) strange -- RSA not used  3:(2)  4:(3)  5:(0)
47993W          14/15 pass	1:(3)  2:(3)  3:(3)  4:(3)  5:(2)
48044P           0/15 fail	1:()  2:()  3:()  4:()  5:()
48052B          13/15 pass	1:(3)  2:(3)  3:(2)  4:(3)  5:(2)
48332T           5/15 fail	1:()  2:(1) confusion of concepts  3:(2)  4:()  5:(2)  
48850B          12/15 pass	1:(3) yes, there is a supergroup of order 1026 generated by [596, 351]  2:(3)  3:(2)  4:(3)  5:(1)
49466L          14/15 pass	1:(3)  2:(3) why is bob's key used   3:(3)  4:(3)  5:(2)
49469P          13/15 pass	1:(3)  2:(3)  3:(3)  4:(3)  5:(1)
49500F           0/15 fail	1:()  2:()  3:()  4:()  5:()
49506N           0/15 fail	1:()  2:()  3:()  4:()  5:()
49540J          14/15 pass	1:(3) order is 513  2:(2) "A sends a message encrypted with her public key" ?!  3:(3)  4:(3) what's this stuff about GF(256) ?   5:(3)
49612D          13/15 pass	1:(3)  2:(2) sequence number assumes that bob and alice "are in sync"; attacker may disrupt this sequence by removing messages. challenge-response would be secure against such attacks.  3:(3)  4:(3)  5:(2)
49619M          10/15 pass	1:(3)  2:(2) no challenge-response; suspectible to replay attack  3:(2)  4:(2) f(10000) and points wrong   5:(1)
49825J          10/15 pass	1:(2) for effort  2:(3)  3:(2)  4:(3)  5:(0)
49932A           0/15 fail	1:()  2:()  3:()  4:()  5:()
50007W          11/15 pass	1:(3)  2:(3)  3:(3)  4:(2) errors  5:(0)
51023K          14/15 pass	1:(3) order is 513  2:(3)  3:(2)  4:(3)  5:(3)
51050U           0/15 fail	1:()  2:()  3:()  4:()  5:()
51075D           0/15 fail	1:()  2:()  3:()  4:()  5:()
51121N           0/15 fail	1:()  2:()  3:()  4:()  5:()
51135H          15/15 pass	1:(3) order is 513  2:(3)  3:(3)  4:(3)  5:(3)
51213K          10/15 pass	1:(3)  2:(3) "encryption with secret key" = signature  3:()  4:(3)  5:(1)
52572W          10/15 pass	1:(2)  order is wrong  2:(2) falls to replay attack   3:(2)  4:(3)  5:(1)
52617H          15/15 pass	1:(3)  2:(3)  3:(3)  4:(3)  5:(3)
52717N           7/15 fail	1:(1)  2:(3)  3:(3)  4:(0)  5:(0)
52820A           6/15 fail	1:(1)  2:(2) seems to fall to a replay attack 3:(3)  4:()  5:()
52834S           0/15 fail	1:()  2:()  3:()  4:()  5:()
54130W          12/15 pass	1:(3)  2:(3)  3:(3)  4:(3)  5:(0)
54134D           0/15 fail	1:()  2:()  3:()  4:()  5:()
54715S          10/15 pass	1:(2) for effort 2:(2) exactly what is bob checking ?   3:(2)  4:(2) for effort (wrong answers)  5:(2)
57398W           0/15 fail	1:()  2:()  3:()  4:()  5:()
57950A          10/15 pass	1:(2)  code for R, not GF(997)  2:(2) confusion with private/public key, signatures/encryption  3:(2)   4:(2)  5:(2)
59868W          12/15 pass	1:(3)  2:(3)  3:(2)  4:(3)  5:(1)
60057V           0/15 fail	1:()  2:()  3:()  4:()  5:()
?Issaeva        13/15 pass	1:(3)  2:(1) algebra doesn't seem to hold (hashes are invertible)  3:(3)  4:(3)  5:(3)