36474R		7/15 fail	1: (3) although rather convoluted reasoning  2: (1) bad attack   3: (0) totally wrong 4: (0)  5: (2) no 48-bit collision, apparently slow algorithm
43473B		8/15 fail	1: (3)  2: (1) bad attack  3: (1) wrong number  4: (3)  5: (0)
44581J		7/15 fail	1: (2) c is unrealistic  2: (1)  3: (1)   4: (3)  5: (0)
44656H		12/15 pass	1: (3)  2: (1) bad attack  3: (2) number missing  4: (3)  5: (3) surprised that this works :)
45181W		plagiarism ?	[ 4/15 fail	1: (2) c is off  2: (0) copypaste  3: (0)  4: (1) how did you find p and q ?  5: (1) no collision]
45283H		6/15 fail	1: (1) wrong  2: (1) bad attack  3: (1) wrong number  4: (3)  5: (0)
46576J		7/15 fail	1: (3)   2: (1) no attack  3: (0) totally wrong  4: (3)  5: (0)
46602S		8/15 fail	1: (3)  2: (0) no attack  3: (1) wrong 4: (3)  5: (1) very slow algorithm
46770N		11/15 pass	1: (3) reasonable  3: (2) best attack not found  3: (1) wrong number  4: (3)  5: (2) no 48-bit collision - bad algorithm
47991U		11/15 pass	1: (3) reasonable 2: (1) answers wrong question  3: (1) wrong number  4: (3)  5: (3) 
47993W		4/15 fail	1: (1) wrong model  2: (1) bad attack  3: (1) wrong number  4: (1) no real solution  5: (0)
48044P		13/15 pass	1: (3)  2: (3)  3: (3) "approximation" is actually correct  4: (1) for honesty  5: (3)
48052B		14/15 pass	1: (3) reasonable  2: (2) bad attack  3: (3)  4: (3)  5: (3)
48332T		12/15 pass	1: (1) all numbers off  2: (2) right idea, incorrect numbers 3: (3) 4: (3) 5: (3)
48850B		13/15 pass	1: (3) although answers a slightly different question  2: (3)  3: (1) numbers are wrong  4: (3)  5: (3)
49466L		11/15 pass	1: (1) all numbers wrong (and time is asked for)  2: (2) no attack found  3: (3)  4: (3)  5: (2) no 48-bit collision found - slow algorithm
49469P		11/15 pass	1: (3)  3: (1) bad attack  3: (1) wrong  4: (3)  5: (3) although memory-intesive algorithm used
49500F		5/15 fail	1: (1) wrong  2: (1) weird and wrong  3: (0) totally wrong  4: (3)  5: (0)
49506N		10/15 pass	1: (3) reasonable  2: (0)  3: (1) funny  4: (3)  5: (3)
49540J		11/15 pass	1: (3) reasonable 2: (1) bad attack  3: (1) wrong number  4: (3)  5: (3)
49612D		12/15 pass	1: (3)  2: (1) bad attack  3: (3)  4: (3)  5: (2) collision not found -- due to not having O(1) memory algorithm
49619M		12/15 pass	1: (3) reasonable  2: (2) bad attack  3: (3)  4: (3)  5: (1) how can this possibly work ?! no collisions found.
49825J		10/15 pass 	[after consultation] 1: (3) 2: (2)   3: (2)  4: (3)  5: (0)
49932A		10/15 pass	[after consultation] 1: (3) reasonable 2: (3)   3: (2) wrong number 4: (0)  5: (2) no collision found -- really slow algorithm
50007W		10/15 pass	1: (1) all numbers off  2: (3)  3: (3) although number is missing  4: (3)  5: (0)
51023K		14/15 pass	1: (3)  2: (3) although concrete probability is missing  3: (3)  4: (2) little original effort  5: (3) surprised that this works
51050U		10/15 pass	1: (3) reasonable  2: (1) bad attack  3: (3)  4: (3)  5: (0)
51075D		7/15 fail	1: (2) a) is wrong  2: (1) bad attack  3: (1) wrong number (too small) 4: (3) 5: (0)
51121N		11/15 pass	1: (3) although abc -> cba  2: (1) bad attack  3: (1) wrong number  4: (3)  5: (3) astonished that this works!
51135H		13/15 pass	1: (3) reasonable  2: (1) bad attack  3: (3)  4: (3) nice scheme!  5: (3)
51213K		10/15 pass	1: (3) borderline   2: (2)   3: (2)   4: (0)  5: (3) 
52572W		14/15 pass	1: (3)  2: (2)  3: (3)  4: (3) 5: (3)
52617H		12/15 pass	1: (2) c is off  2: (3)  3: (3)  4: (2) good, but where are the results ?  5: (2) bad algorithm
52717N		10/15 pass	[after consultation] 1: (1) a off 2: (0)  3: (0)  4: (0)  5: (0)
52820A		10/15 pass	[after consultation] 1: (3) reasonable 2: (1) bad attack   3: (3) 4: (0)  5: (0)
52834S		9/15 fail	1: (3) reasonable  2: (2) no attack  3: (1) wrong number  4: (3)  5: (0)
54130W		10/15 pass	1: (3) reasonable  2: (1) bad attack  3: (1) wrong number  4: (3)  5: (2) slow algorithm
54134D		plagiarism ?	[ 4/15 fail	1: (2) c is off  2: (0) copypaste  3: (0)  4: (1) how did you find p and q ?  5: (1) no collision]
54715S		10/15 pass	1: (3)  2: (1) attack not applicable  3: (1) wrong number  4: (3)  5: (2) no 48-bit collision due to not having O(1) memory algorithm
57398W		10/15 pass	1: (3) reasonable  2: (1) bad attack  3: (3)  4: (3)  5: (0)
57950A		7/15 fail	1: (3) reasonable  2: (1) bad attack  3: (1) wrong number  4: (2) no numbers  5: (0)
59868W		6/15 fail	1: (2) numbers are off  2: (2) kinda there..  3: (1) wrong number  4: (1) how did you find p and q ?  5: (0)
60057V		10/15 pass	1: (3)  2: (2) mistakes  3: (1) wrong number (too small) 4: (2) details missing 5: (2) code not practical
?Issaeva	14/15 pass	1: (3)  2: (2) good try - no attack  3: (3)  4: (3)  5: (3)